Broadway review
Raw and Heartwarming, ‘Heisenberg’ Should Capture Your Heart
Website:
The Daily Beast
Date:
October 14, 2016
Set on the sparest, most un-Broadway-like stage, Simon Stephens’s play Heisenberg is an intriguing tale of unlikely love.
With a few tables and chairs, arranged and rearranged by the actors themselves, we are convincingly transported—in an unbroken 80-minute span—from train stations to parks, a butcher’s shop, and a bedroom.
Georgie Burns and Alex Priest, total strangers, meet on the forecourt of London’s St. Pancras station, when she kisses him on the back of his neck.
Set on the sparest, most un-Broadway-like stage, Simon Stephens’s play Heisenberg is an intriguing tale of unlikely love.
With a few tables and chairs, arranged and rearranged by the actors themselves, we are convincingly transported—in an unbroken 80-minute span—from train stations to parks, a butcher’s shop, and a bedroom.
Georgie Burns and Alex Priest, total strangers, meet on the forecourt of London’s St. Pancras station, when she kisses him on the back of his neck.
“There’s something about cities that just makes me really fucking happy,” she says, any notion of overshare totally absent. “It’s the monumental amount of people. The gaps in between them creates this crackle. I find it intoxicating.”
Alex is so stolid and Georgie so skittish that the impulse seems less set toward romance between them than simply whether they can survive being in each other’s company without some harm, physical or psychological, being done.
Parker and Arndt are each other’s perfect foil. Nothing is overstated or overplayed: The lack of adornment in Mark Wendland’s stage design focuses the audience’s mind on Stephens’s crisp, witty text and Mark Brokaw’s unflashy direction.
The duo’s second encounter takes place five days later at his butcher’s. Alex again is puzzled and irritated at Georgie’s intrusion, responding gruffly to her admission that she had Googled his name with “I don’t know what to say about that.”
This encounter turns her story on its head: She admits she has lied to him. “I think it’s probably best if you assume that everything I told you when I saw you last week was a complete fabrication.”
His rigidity in the face of her incursions—“Are you a bit freaked out now?” she asks. “A little,” he replies—makes for a fascinating parry and thrust and cat-and-mouse. But again, that nagging question: At this point, wouldn’t you just take your leave? Alex, implausibly, does not.
Still, at this point the play pirouettes to bring him out of his shell. “I’m not shy,” Alex says, ushering from this quiet man the most unquiet of speeches—the first of a standout trio, in which he decries the obsession with “feeling” in today’s world. Alex, it turns out, is full of passion.
“You can’t go anywhere without these fucking wretched conversations about feelings being shoved down your throat,” he says. “Literally down your throat. With clenched fists. I feel my clothes and the wind on my face. I don’t feel. I fucking think.”
He’s a great dancer, he reveals. Teach me, she says coquettishly. “I don’t teach. I dance with other dancers.
Go and learn. Then come back and ask me again,” is his light response.
Both he and she reveal a litany of true past hurts. At the next scene, a Turkish restaurant in Holborn, Alex says: “I’ve never spoken as honestly as this about anything before. It feels as a bit like having an electric shock.”
Love has eluded both Alex and Georgie for very different reasons, but even chewing over this doesn’t bring saccharine confessions and pat self-discovery.
If Alex has a bedrock of pain, he lives with an eye to pleasure: He loves both walking everywhere and music, and in a truly delightful speech recites the genres of music he listens to.
Arndt recites this on-the-page-prosaic list with lilting, serenely punctuated precision—half an exercise in composition, half an exercise in watching his face break out in excitement and joy: “I started with rock ’n’ roll. And then I moved on to rhythm and blues. Gospel music. Country and Western. And Mod music.
Garage rock. Psychedelic. Hippie music. Jazz music. Funk. String quartets…” And it goes on, we tickled by each new addition, until the conclusion—“dub step,” said as lightly as you will ever hear that said.
Later, Arndt performs a completely charming mini-act of ballet, which was greeted with a chorus of “wows” from our audience.
However, we discover, the kiss on the neck at the station hadn’t been so spontaneous after all, which may have been obvious to those deconstructing the title of the play carefully: The Heisenberg Principle asserts there is a limit to the precision with which certain pairs of physical properties of a particle can ever be fixed.
The play doesn’t overtly state this, or even mention Heisenberg, so all your Heisenberg homework must be done before or after seeing the play. My guess: Alex and Georgie possess behavior and personalities unknowable singly, and even more so having collided together.
“Personalities are just the sum of the individual things that people do,” Georgie says. “And the path that connects between them. They’re never fixed. They can always change. They mean nothing.”
The play’s denouement takes place overlooking the Hackensack River in New Jersey, Alex savoring its foreign-to-him name as well as the “Pulaski Skyway.” Another tour de force speech about love in the everyday, spoken initially as a repudiation of love, was equally savored by our audience.
The play has divided critics. It was hailed by The New York Times when it was first performed last year, but others have found Heisenberg “trite.” For me, its romantic focus was plausibly leavened with big themes, its two lead performances were in thrumming tandem—with Arndt particularly winning.
It still seems baffling Alex didn’t run a mile on that first meeting, though.